·中科院2007年生物化学(甲)试题与答案
·陈阅增《普通生物学辅导与习题集》
·《生物化学笔记2009版》
·优惠套餐B(中科院考研必备)
·生化笔记2009版与细胞笔记2009版套餐
·优惠套餐A(中科院考研必备)
·《细胞生物学辅导与习题集》
·《生物化学辅导与习题集》
·《细胞生物学笔记2009版》
·中科院《细胞生物学考研试题及答案》14套
·中科院《生化与分子考研试题及答案》11套
[F] Starbucks is a very good example where coffee is coffee but they decided to sell it differently, put a higher price, make it good-tasting and make it an experience rather than just some coffee. In fact, I’ve heard that if Starbucks closed its shops, a lot of people would go crazy. They are in such a habit of going to the Starbucks before work, taking the coffee, and they’d become desperate otherwise.”
Part C
Directions:
Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on Answer Sheet 2. (10 points)
Every year college enrolment time in China brings many controversies and stories.Rising tuition fees, the chances of poverty-stricken students entering colleges, enrolment corruption, regional equality of enrolment, curriculum reforms—all are themes of vigorous public debate. A topic of hot debate is the regional equality of the country’s college enrolment.
(46) China’s colleges are mostly publicly invested, with some key national universities, such as Peking University and Tsinghua University, financed by the central government, with the others mainly funded by local governments. The Ministry of Education sets quotas for these key colleges and universities concerning how many students they should enroll from different regions. They are entitled to make small adjustments to the quota plan.
(47) The issue of regional equality arises from the fact that many of the high-quality national universities financed by the central government admit a large proportion of students from where they are located, putting applicants from other regions at a “disadvantage.”
Some people argue that since these national universities are financed by the central government funds, or taxation paid by people from all regions, they should not favour local candidates. By not doing so, they are damaging educational equality. (48) Proponents of the differentiated enrolment policy argue that these universities have received various policy supports from local governments and it is justifiable for them to offer preferential terms to local applicants.Both arguments hold water, since this is a complicated question with no easy answers.
It is a practice in many countries to favour, to a varied extent, local candidates in the en




